You're not wrong. Pathfinder's creators were involved with the creation of D&D 3.5. They split off and made their own version of the system, under the name Pathfinder. It's stood apart from D&D, as a rival and biggest competitor ever since. There's more to the story, but I can't recall it all off the top of my head.
Oh, that makes sense then. From the time period, it seems like it came out in response to 4e. Probably sparked by the drastic change in style? I know there was a big backlash to it, even though I honestly kinda liked the game. More games is never really a bad thing, though.
That’s cool. I never got to play 3.5e all THAT much but the one time I did I kinda found it a bit cumbersome. It was forever ago, so I don’t remember the specifics, but I definitely remember having trouble making the character. This was like, right out of high school for me, though, so I could’ve just been bad.
Less restriction is always a good thing, I think. Giving players more to work with.
sirixtheunicorn liked this
daxlyn liked this wuachuma liked this
nessvii liked this
xowatle liked this
apatheticgourmand liked this
junkheadsrandomjunk liked this
thebookofeclipse liked this
borgerbuns said: from what I’ve heard from some friends who play dnd, Pathfinder has a lot of stuff in it but they usually never get balanced. DnD has less stuff but has much more stuff. You should probably go with the newest version of DnD but go with what you want
hiredeadpony liked this
capitalistleviathan liked this
deadbison liked this
nihilagis liked this
estinadaemon reblogged this from reisartjunk
schpeelah reblogged this from reisartjunk omnonim liked this
dimvitrarius liked this
bizarrodf liked this
reisartjunk posted this
