Age Confirmation

This blog contains images that are not safe for work. Are you over 18?

reiart
You're not wrong. Pathfinder's creators were involved with the creation of D&D 3.5. They split off and made their own version of the system, under the name Pathfinder. It's stood apart from D&D, as a rival and biggest competitor ever since. There's more to the story, but I can't recall it all off the top of my head.

Oh, that makes sense then. From the time period, it seems like it came out in response to 4e. Probably sparked by the drastic change in style? I know there was a big backlash to it, even though I honestly kinda liked the game. More games is never really a bad thing, though.

image
image
image

That’s cool. I never got to play 3.5e all THAT much but the one time I did I kinda found it a bit cumbersome. It was forever ago, so I don’t remember the specifics, but I definitely remember having trouble making the character. This was like, right out of high school for me, though, so I could’ve just been bad.

Less restriction is always a good thing, I think. Giving players more to work with.

  1. borgerbuns said: from what I’ve heard from some friends who play dnd, Pathfinder has a lot of stuff in it but they usually never get balanced. DnD has less stuff but has much more stuff. You should probably go with the newest version of DnD but go with what you want
  2. estinadaemon reblogged this from reisartjunk
  3. schpeelah reblogged this from reisartjunk
  4. return-of-the-waywardfoals said: I don’t know what that dim guy is talking about with the power level. From what a friend told me, who’s a huge fan f the game, they nerfed quite a few of the more infamous aspects of the game, though I could be wrong.
  5. reisartjunk posted this